Side-by-side comparisons of pack-ripping sites, graders and products.
Buyback percentages are meaningless without the expected value they apply to. Net EV multiplies the two. Machine-by-machine figures for eight platforms on their own valuations, plus a 57-card cross-check of whether Collector Crypt's values are real.
Read itThe three largest tokenized-card platforms compared without our publisher in the table: Solana and Polygon, PSA and Brink's vaults, 85% of insured value against 90% of fair market value, and who lets you verify a draw.
Read itA 90% no-fee buyback on mostly raw cards against an 83% buyback on graded slabs with the EV published. The percentage is not the story.
Read itDerek Jeter's in-house grader against a Sui pack platform: published per-card odds and in-house slabs versus published EV and third-party grades.
Read itBrink's custody and a 90%-minus-6% SWAP inside fifteen minutes, against an unnamed vault, 83% and seven days. Different answers to the same question.
Read itTwo Pokemon-first tokenized platforms: Phygitals has commit-reveal fairness, named US vaults and pawn loans; Rip Station has published EV per machine and a seven-day window.
Read itThe best-funded tokenized-card platform against the Sui newcomer: Brink's and a 90% headline buyback on one side, published EV and a seven-day window on the other.
Read itSui versus Solana, a published timestamped estimate versus a company-assigned 'insured value', seven days versus three, and the one column Collector Crypt wins outright: verifiable randomness.
Read itSix platforms that record vaulted cards on a blockchain, compared on chain, custodian, buyback basis and window, fees, shipping, verifiable randomness and trust. Dated sources on every cell.
Read itTwelve online pack-ripping platforms compared on what is in the packs, buyback terms, who sets the value, custody, verifiable odds and trust signals. Every number is dated and sourced, including the ones that do not favour our publisher.
Read it